Litteraturlista: Klimatförändringen, vetenskap och samhälle (MVEN15) höstterminen 2025

Litteraturlistan består av obligatorisk litteratur och referenslitteratur. Litteratur tillkommer i relation till uppgifter och övningar. Viss kurslitteratur finns tillgängligt digitalt. Dessa nås antingen via en organisations hemsida eller LUBcat-katalog. Läs här hur du får åtkomst hemifrån till elektroniska resurser som tillhandahålls av LU: https://www.naturvetenskap-bibliotek.lu.se/soka/atkomst-till elektroniska-resurser-hemifran

Kursansvarig

Niklas Vareman
niklas [dot] vareman [at] med [dot] lu [dot] se
 

Obligatorisk litteratur

Houghton, J. 2015. ”Global warming, the complete briefing”, femte upplagan, Cambridge University Press.  Finns som e-bok på UB:https://www-cambridge-org.ludwig.lub.lu.se/highereducation/books/global warming/

Anderson, K. Broderick, J. F & Stoddard, I. (2020): A factor of two: how the mitigation plans of ‘climate progressive’ nations fall far short of Paris-compliant pathways, Climate Policy, 20(10), 1290-1304.

Boyd, E., Chaffin, B. C., Dorkenoo, K., Jackson, G., Harrington, L., N’Guetta, A., Johansson, E. L., Nordlander, L., Paolo De Rosa, S., Raju, E., Scown, M., Soo, J., & Stuart-Smith, R. (2021). Loss and damage from climate change: A new climate justice agenda. One Earth, 4(10).

Birkmann, J., Feldmeyer, D., McMillan, J. M., Solecki, W., Totin, E., Roberts, D., Trisos, C., Jamshed, A., Boyd, E., & Wrathall, D. (2021). Regional clusters of vulnerability show the need for transboundary cooperation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9)

Fanning, A.L., O’Neill, D.W., Hickel, J. et al. (2022). The social shortfall and ecological overshoot of
nations. Nature Sustainability 5, 26–36.

Jorgenson, AK, Fiske, S, Hubacek, K, et al. (2019). Social science perspectives on drivers of and responses to global climate change. WIREs Clim Change. 2019; 10:e554.

Lövbrand, E., Beck, S., Chilvers, J., Forsyth, T., Hedrén, J., Hulme, M., ... Vasileiadou, E. (2015). Who speaks for the future of Earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change, 32, 211–218.

Popper, K. (1963). Ch. 1. Science: Conjectures and Refutations, in Popper, K. Conjectures and Refutations. Routledge, London. (länk till pdf på Canvas)

Ridley, D. (2012). The Literature Review: a step-by-step guide for students, SAGE

Sage. (u.å.). Sage research methods. https://methods.sagepub.com/  

Seto, K. C., Davis, S. J., Mitchell, R. B., Stokes, E. C., Unruh, G., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2016). Carbon Lock-In: Types, Causes, and Policy Implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934

Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environmental Planning A, 42, 1273–1285

Stoddard, I., Anderson, K., Capstick, S., Carton, W., Depledge, J., Facer, K., Gough, C., Hache, F., Hoolohan, C., Hultman, M., Hällström, N., Kartha, S., Klinsky, S., Kuchler, M., Lövbrand, E., Nasiritousi, N., Newell, P., Peters, G. P., Sokona, Y., ... Williams, M (2021). Three Decades of Climate Mitigation: Why Haven’t We Bent the Global Emissions Curve?Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46(1), 653–689.

Referenslitteratur 

Boyd, E., 2017. Climate adaptation: Holistic thinking beyond technology. Nature Climate Change 7, 97–98.

Buschmann, P, Oels, A. The overlooked role of discourse in breaking carbon lock-in: The case of the German energy transition.WIREs Clim Change. 2019; 10:e574.

Creutzig, F., Roy, J., Lamb, W. F., Azevedo, I. M. L., Bruine de Bruin, W., Dalkmann, H., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Geels, F. W., Grubler, A., Hepburn, C., Hertwich, E. G., Khosla, R., Mattauch, L., Minx, J. C., Ramakrishnan, A., Rao, N. D., Steinberger, J. K., Tavoni, M., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., & Weber, E. U. (2018). Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nature Climate Change, 8(4).

Jackson, 2019. The Post-growth Challenge: Secular Stagnation, Inequality and the Limits to Growth, Ecological Economics, 156, pp. 236-246.

Jorgenson, AK. (2012). Analysing fossil-fuel displacement. Nature Climate Change, 2, 398-399.

Jänicke, 2008. Ecological modernisation: new perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production. 16(5), 557-565. 

Kallis, Kerschner & Martinez-Alier. (2012). The economics of degrowth, Ecological Economics, 84, 172-180.

Nielsen, K. S., Nicholas, K. A., Creutzig, F., Dietz, T., & Stern, P. C. (2021). The role of high- socioeconomic-status people in locking in or rapidly reducing energy-driven greenhouse gas emissions. Nature Energy, 6(11), 1011–1016.

Malm, A., & Hornborg, A. (2014). The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review  1(1), 62–69.

McNamara, K. E., & Jackson, G. (2019). Loss and damage: A review of the literature and directions for future research. WIREs Climate Change, 10(2).

Mol, A. P. & Spaargaren, G. 2000. Ecological modernisation theory in debate: a review. Environmental politics, 9, 17-49.

O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018). A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 1(2), 88–95.

Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2012). Human drivers of national greenhouse-gas emissions. Nature Climate Change, 2(8), 581–586.

Scoones, I. 2016. The Politics of Sustainability and Development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41,293-310.

Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C., 2015. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98.

Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L.T. et al. (2020) Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nat Commun 11, 3107

Wright, E. O. (2015). Sociological limitations of the climate change encyclical. Nature Climate Change, 10(5), 902–903.