The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here:

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Default user image.

Nitin Chaudhary


Default user image.

Patchy field sampling biases understanding of climate change impacts across the Arctic


  • Daniel B. Metcalfe
  • Thirze D.G. Hermans
  • Jenny Ahlstrand
  • Michael Becker
  • Martin Berggren
  • Robert G. Björk
  • Mats P. Björkman
  • Daan Blok
  • Nitin Chaudhary
  • Chelsea Chisholm
  • Aimée T. Classen
  • Niles J. Hasselquist
  • Micael Jonsson
  • Jeppe A. Kristensen
  • Bright B. Kumordzi
  • Hanna Lee
  • Jordan R. Mayor
  • Janet Prevéy
  • Karolina Pantazatou
  • Johannes Rousk
  • Ryan A. Sponseller
  • Maja K. Sundqvist
  • Jing Tang
  • Johan Uddling
  • Göran Wallin
  • Wenxin Zhang
  • Anders Ahlström
  • David E. Tenenbaum
  • Abdulhakim M. Abdi

Summary, in English

Effective societal responses to rapid climate change in the Arctic rely on an accurate representation of region-specific ecosystem properties and processes. However, this is limited by the scarcity and patchy distribution of field measurements. Here, we use a comprehensive, geo-referenced database of primary field measurements in 1,840 published studies across the Arctic to identify statistically significant spatial biases in field sampling and study citation across this globally important region. We find that 31% of all study citations are derived from sites located within 50 km of just two research sites: Toolik Lake in the USA and Abisko in Sweden. Furthermore, relatively colder, more rapidly warming and sparsely vegetated sites are under-sampled and under-recognized in terms of citations, particularly among microbiology-related studies. The poorly sampled and cited areas, mainly in the Canadian high-Arctic archipelago and the Arctic coastline of Russia, constitute a large fraction of the Arctic ice-free land area. Our results suggest that the current pattern of sampling and citation may bias the scientific consensuses that underpin attempts to accurately predict and effectively mitigate climate change in the region. Further work is required to increase both the quality and quantity of sampling, and incorporate existing literature from poorly cited areas to generate a more representative picture of Arctic climate change and its environmental impacts.


  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate
  • Dept of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science
  • Microbial Ecology
  • MERGE: ModElling the Regional and Global Earth System

Publishing year







Nature Ecology and Evolution





Document type

Journal article


Nature Publishing Group


  • Physical Geography
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Climate Research


  • Arctic
  • Climate research
  • Global change ecology




  • BECC Action Group: Identifying gaps and priorities in Arctic environmental research

Research group

  • Microbial Ecology


  • ISSN: 2397-334X