The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Juliana Dänhardt. Photo.

Juliana Dänhardt

Research coordinator

Juliana Dänhardt. Photo.

How can the European Common Agricultural Policy help halt biodiversity loss? Recommendations by over 300 experts

Author

  • Guy Pe'er
  • John A. Finn
  • Mario Díaz
  • Maren Birkenstock
  • Sebastian Lakner
  • Norbert Röder
  • Yanka Kazakova
  • Tanja Šumrada
  • Peter Bezák
  • Elena D. Concepción
  • Juliana Dänhardt
  • Manuel B. Morales
  • Ilona Rac
  • Jana Špulerová
  • Stefan Schindler
  • Menelaos Stavrinides
  • Stefano Targetti
  • Davide Viaggi
  • Ioannis N. Vogiatzakis
  • Hervé Guyomard
Show all

Summary, in English

The European Union's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has not halted farmland biodiversity loss. The CAP post-2023 has a new ‘‘Green Architecture,’’ including the new ‘‘Eco-scheme’’ instrument. How can this new Green Architecture help tackle the biodiversity crisis? Through 13 workshops and an online survey, over 300 experts from 23 European Member States addressed this question. From experts’ contributions, key principles for success include preserving and restoring (semi)natural elements and extensive grasslands; improving spatial planning and landscape-scale implementation, including through collective actions; implementing result-based approaches; and improved knowledge exchange. To maximize the effectiveness of Eco-scheme for biodiversity, experts highlighted the need to prioritize evidence-based actions, allocate a sufficient budget for biodiversity, and incentivize management improvements through higher payment levels. Additionally, stronger coherence is needed among CAP instruments. For effective CAP implementation, the European Commission and the Member States should expand investments in biodiversity monitoring, knowledge transfer, and capacity-building within relevant institutions. The remaining risks in the CAP's ability to reverse the loss of farmland biodiversity still require better design, closer monitoring, greater transparency, and better engagement with farmers. Additionally, greater involvement of scientists is needed to guide the CAP toward restoring farmland biodiversity while accounting for synergies and trade-offs with other objectives.

Department/s

  • Centre for Environmental and Climate Science (CEC)
  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate

Publishing year

2022

Language

English

Publication/Series

Conservation Letters

Volume

15

Issue

6

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Topic

  • Environmental Management

Keywords

  • agri-environment-climate measures
  • Common Agricultural Policy
  • Eco-schemes
  • European Union
  • farmland biodiversity
  • green architecture
  • monitoring
  • science-policy
  • strategic plans

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1755-263X