The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Markku Rummukainen. Photo.

Markku Rummukainen

Professor

Markku Rummukainen. Photo.

GCM characteristics explain the majority of uncertainty in projected 21st century terrestrial ecosystem carbon balance

Author

  • Anders Ahlström
  • Benjamin Smith
  • Johan Lindström
  • Markku Rummukainen
  • Cintia Bertacchi Uvo

Summary, in English

One of the largest sources of uncertainties in modelling of the future global climate is the response of the terrestrial carbon cycle. Studies have shown that it is likely that the extant land sink of carbon will weaken in a warming climate. Should this happen, a larger portion of the annual carbon dioxide emissions will remain in the atmosphere, and further increase global warming, which in turn may further weaken the land sink. We investigate the potential sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystem carbon balance to differences in future climate simulated by four general circulation models (GCMs) under three different CO2 concentration scenarios. We find that the response in simulated carbon balance is more influenced by GCMs than CO2 concentration scenarios. Empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis of sea surface temperatures (SSTs) reveals differences among GCMs in simulated SST variability leading to decreased tropical ecosystem productivity in two out of four GCMs. We extract parameters describing GCM characteristics by parameterizing a statistical emulator mimicking the carbon balance response simulated by a full dynamic ecosystem model. By sampling two GCM-specific parameters and global temperatures we create 60 new "artificial" GCMs and investigate the extent to which the GCM characteristics may explain the uncertainty in global carbon balance under future radiative forcing. Differences among GCMs in the representation of SST variability and ENSO and its effect on precipitation and temperature patterns explain the majority of the uncertainty in the future evolution of global terrestrial ecosystem carbon in our analysis. We suggest that the characterisation and evaluation of patterns and trends in simulated SST variability should be a priority for the further development of GCMs, in particular as vegetation dynamics and carbon cycle feedbacks are incorporated.

Department/s

  • Dept of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science
  • Mathematical Statistics
  • Centre for Environmental and Climate Science (CEC)
  • Division of Water Resources Engineering
  • MERGE: ModElling the Regional and Global Earth system
  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate

Publishing year

2013

Language

English

Pages

1517-1528

Publication/Series

Biogeosciences

Volume

10

Issue

3

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Copernicus Publications

Topic

  • Water Engineering
  • Probability Theory and Statistics
  • Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
  • Physical Geography

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1726-4189