Henrik Smith, Professor of Animal ecology, Chair of the Centre for Environmental and Climate Science (CEC), and Coordinator for the strategic research area BECC (Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in a Changing Climate), is both delighted and unsurprised by the ranking.
“Both! It’s not surprising that we rank highly, but of course, it’s a pleasant surprise that we ranked as high as we did,” he says.
What explains Lund University's top ranking?
“A systematic effort has been made over a long period to strengthen Lund University's sustainability profile, through initiatives such as the Sustainability Forum and the sustainability strategy that has guided our work. There are also a number of high-profile interdisciplinary activities that have likely contributed, such as the Agenda 2030 Graduate School, the Knowledge for Sustainable Development conference, and interdisciplinary units like CEC, LUCSUS, and the International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics (IIIEE), as well as sustainability initiatives within our strategic research areas.”
As a pioneer of interdisciplinary approaches to sustainability at Lund University, what role do you think your initiatives have played in the ranking?
“Of course, I feel proud of my contributions on a day like this. However, it’s important to remember that the ranking is primarily the result of the work carried out over a long period by a large number of sustainability-engaged researchers and other staff members across the university.”
What direction would you like to see the university take moving forward in terms of sustainability?
“It’s crucial that the university doesn’t become complacent but continues to prioritize sustainability in research and education. Collaboration often requires interdisciplinarity, so the university must facilitate the development of research, education, and collaboration across departmental and faculty boundaries.”
Link to Lund University’s press release:
https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/article/lund-university-ranked-third-world-qs-sustainability-ranking