Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Foto på Mattias Ohlsson

Mattias Ohlsson

Professor

Foto på Mattias Ohlsson

The optimal reference population for cardiac normality in myocardial SPET in the detection of coronary artery stenoses: patients with normal coronary angiography or subjects with low likelihood of coronary artery disease?

Författare

  • Jens Toft
  • Dan Lindahl
  • Mattias Ohlsson
  • John Palmer
  • Anders Lundin
  • Lars Edenbrandt
  • Birger Hesse

Summary, in English

Both subjects with a low likelihood for coronary artery disease (CAD) and patients with normal findings on coronary angiography have been used as reference populations in non-invasive stress testing, including myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Both of these criteria of normality--low likelihood of CAD and normal coronary angiography--have been criticised, and consensus on this issue is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare two different reference populations by testing the performance of artificial neural networks designed to interpret myocardial scintigrams. The networks were trained on myocardial perfusion scintigrams from 87 patients with angiographically documented CAD and on studies from one of two different reference groups: 48 patients with no signs of CAD based on angiography or 128 healthy volunteers with a likelihood for CAD <5%. The performance of the two different networks was then tested using scintigrams from a separate test group of 68 patients. Coronary angiography was used as the gold standard in this group. The network trained on patients with no signs of CAD based on angiography showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 93%. The ROC area for the network trained on healthy volunteers was 72%, and this difference was statistically significant (P=0.03). The results of this study using artificial neural networks suggest that normal angiography should be preferred as the reference standard in myocardial scintigraphy when a patient is examined for CAD prior to possible angiography. Whether the same is true for other indications, e.g. in prognostic evaluation, is unknown.

Avdelning/ar

  • Klinisk fysiologi, Lund
  • Medicinsk strålningsfysik, Lund
  • Diagnostisk radiologi, Lund
  • Nuklearmedicin, Malmö

Publiceringsår

2001

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

831-835

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

European Journal Of Nuclear Medicine

Volym

28

Issue

7

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

Springer

Ämne

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging

Nyckelord

  • Reference standards
  • Normality
  • Neural network
  • Myocardial single-photon emission tomography

Status

Published

Forskningsgrupp

  • Nuclear medicine, Malmö

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 1432-105X