The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Romain Carrie. Photo.

Romain Carrié

Researcher

Romain Carrie. Photo.

Increasing crop heterogeneity enhances multitrophic diversity across agricultural regions

Author

  • Clélia Sirami
  • Nicolas Gross
  • Aliette Bosem Baillod
  • Colette Bertrand
  • Romain Carrié
  • Annika Hass
  • Laura Henckel
  • Paul Miguet
  • Carole Vuillot
  • Audrey Alignier
  • Jude Girard
  • Péter Batáry
  • Yann Clough
  • Cyrille Violle
  • David Giralt
  • Gerard Bota
  • Isabelle Badenhausser
  • Gaëtan Lefebvre
  • Bertrand Gauffre
  • Aude Vialatte
  • François Calatayud
  • Assu Gil-Tena
  • Lutz Tischendorf
  • Scott Mitchell
  • Kathryn Lindsay
  • Romain Georges
  • Samuel Hilaire
  • Jordi Recasens
  • Xavier Oriol Solé-Senan
  • Irene Robleño
  • Jordi Bosch
  • Jose Antonio Barrientos
  • Antonio Ricarte
  • Maria Ángeles Marcos-Garcia
  • Jesús Miñano
  • Raphaël Mathevet
  • Annick Gibon
  • Jacques Baudry
  • Gérard Balent
  • Brigitte Poulin
  • Françoise Burel
  • Teja Tscharntke
  • Vincent Bretagnolle
  • Gavin Siriwardena
  • Annie Ouin
  • Lluis Brotons
  • Jean Louis Martin
  • Lenore Fahrig

Summary, in English

Agricultural landscape homogenization has detrimental effects on biodiversity and key ecosystem services. Increasing agricultural landscape heterogeneity by increasing seminatural cover can help to mitigate biodiversity loss. However, the amount of seminatural cover is generally low and difficult to increase in many intensively managed agricultural landscapes. We hypothesized that increasing the heterogeneity of the crop mosaic itself (hereafter “crop heterogeneity”) can also have positive effects on biodiversity. In 8 contrasting regions of Europe and North America, we selected 435 landscapes along independent gradients of crop diversity and mean field size. Within each landscape, we selected 3 sampling sites in 1, 2, or 3 crop types. We sampled 7 taxa (plants, bees, butterflies, hoverflies, carabids, spiders, and birds) and calculated a synthetic index of multitrophic diversity at the landscape level. Increasing crop heterogeneity was more beneficial for multitrophic diversity than increasing seminatural cover. For instance, the effect of decreasing mean field size from 5 to 2.8 ha was as strong as the effect of increasing seminatural cover from 0.5 to 11%. Decreasing mean field size benefited multitrophic diversity even in the absence of seminatural vegetation between fields. Increasing the number of crop types sampled had a positive effect on landscape-level multitrophic diversity. However, the effect of increasing crop diversity in the landscape surrounding fields sampled depended on the amount of seminatural cover. Our study provides large-scale, multitrophic, cross-regional evidence that increasing crop heterogeneity can be an effective way to increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes without taking land out of agricultural production.

Department/s

  • Centre for Environmental and Climate Science (CEC)
  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate

Publishing year

2019-08-13

Language

English

Pages

16442-16447

Publication/Series

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volume

116

Issue

33

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

National Academy of Sciences

Topic

  • Agricultural Science

Keywords

  • Biodiversity
  • Complementation
  • Crop mosaic
  • Farmland
  • Landscape
  • Multitaxa

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0027-8424