The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Natascha Kljun. Photo.

Natascha Kljun

Professor

Natascha Kljun. Photo.

Data-driven modelling of methane fluxes across a mire complex based on replicated eddy covariance measurements and spatially-resolved driver information

Author

  • Koffi Dodji Noumonvi
  • Mats B. Nilsson
  • Natascha Kljun
  • Joshua L. Ratcliffe
  • Mats G. Öquist
  • Johan E.S. Fransson
  • Matthias Peichl

Summary, in English

Northern mires are significant natural sources of atmospheric methane (CH4), yet estimating CH4 emissions remains challenging due to their complex spatio-temporal dynamics. While eddy covariance (EC) measurements provide valuable insights into ecosystem-scale CH4 fluxes (FCH4) over mire areas typically < 0.05 km², the predictability of FCH4 at the mesoscale (∼0.5 – 20 km²) of a mire complex based on single-site EC measurements has not been explored. In this study, we utilized a network of four EC towers and developed a machine learning approach that integrates these EC data with comprehensive spatial information on drivers to predict FCH4 across a boreal mire complex in Northern Sweden. For this purpose, environmental driver variables were mapped and area-weighted within dynamic EC flux footprints and related to FCH4 in a spatially-explicit random forest model (‘footprint-based model’). For comparison, we also considered a standard random forest model used for gapfilling of FCH4 data that is based on environmental measurements from fixed sensor locations (‘biomet model’). For both models, variable importance analysis revealed NDVI as the strongest predictor of temporal FCH4 patterns, followed by air pressure, soil temperature and water table. Adjusting for site-specific carbon-to-nitrogen (C:N) ratios substantially improved model performance. Both models significantly improved estimates of the mire complex average FCH4 compared to simple extrapolation of single-site measurements, reducing the uncertainty from ∼22 % in 2022 and 32 % in 2023 to <10 % and <25 % for the footprint-based model, and to <11 % and <30 % for the biomet model, respectively. Overall, our findings suggest that the comprehensive spatially-resolved driver information resulted in only marginally improved model performance at our study site. In comparison, the biomet model offers practical advantages through simpler implementation and wider applicability. However, we encourage testing the footprint-based model approach at other more heterogenous sites where it might become superior due to its ability to account for complex site conditions.

Department/s

  • Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences (MGeo)
  • LU Profile Area: Nature-based future solutions
  • LTH Profile Area: Aerosols
  • MERGE: ModElling the Regional and Global Earth system
  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate

Publishing year

2026

Language

English

Publication/Series

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volume

378

Document type

Article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Physical Geography

Keywords

  • Boreal mire complex
  • Eddy covariance
  • Footprint analysis
  • Mesoscale
  • Methane flux
  • Random forest
  • Spatial upscaling

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0168-1923