The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Natascha Kljun. Photo.

Natascha Kljun

Professor

Natascha Kljun. Photo.

Effect of spatial heterogeneity on the validation of remote sensing based GPP estimations

Author

  • Gy Gelybo
  • Zoltan Barcza
  • Anikó Kern
  • Natascha Kljun

Summary, in English

Satellite based remote sensing provides an efficient way to estimate carbon balance components over large spatial domains with acceptable temporal and spatial resolution. In the present study remote sensing based gross primary production (GPP) estimations were evaluated using data from a tall eddy-covariance flux tower, located over a heterogeneous agricultural landscape in Hungary. Four different methods were used to simulate 8-day mean GPP for the tower site based on the MOD17 light use efficiency model. Additionally, we present a novel approach for model validation to exploit the advantage of footprint size similarity between remote sensing and the hourly eddy covariance signal measured at the tall tower. Besides using footprint information for the model validation we performed downscaling of MOD17 using 250 m resolution MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) dataset in order to address land use heterogeneity. The results showed that GPP was underestimated by MOD17 especially in years with average precipitation during the growing season, while model performance was better during dry years. Our downscaling technique significantly improved agreement between the MOD17 model results and the eddy covariance measurements (modeling efficiency (ME) increased from 0.783 to 0.884, root mean square error (RMSE) decreased from 1.095 g C m−2 day−1 to 0.815 g C m−2 day−1), although GPP remained underestimated (bias decreased from −0.680 g C m−2 day−1 to −0.426 g C m−2 day−1). Model evaluation results suggest that model performance should be optimally evaluated using RMSE, index of agreement (IA), ME and bias. The presented method is applicable to any eddy-covariance tower with limitations depending of the complexity of landscape around the flux tower. As incorporation of footprint information clearly impacts validation results, future model validation and/or calibration should also involve source area estimation which can be easily implemented following the presented approach.

Publishing year

2013-06-15

Language

English

Pages

43-53

Publication/Series

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volume

174-175

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences

Keywords

  • Cropland
  • Eddy covariance
  • Footprint
  • Light use efficiency model
  • MODIS

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1873-2240