The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Juliana Dänhardt. Photo.

Juliana Dänhardt

Research coordinator

Juliana Dänhardt. Photo.

The potential for indirect effects between co-flowering plants via shared pollinators depends on resource abundance, accessibility and relatedness

Author

  • Luisa Gigante Carvalheiro
  • Jacobus Christiaan Biesmeijer
  • Gita Benadi
  • Jochen Fruend
  • Martina Stang
  • Ignasi Bartomeus
  • Christopher N. Kaiser-Bunbury
  • Mathilde Baude
  • Sofia I. F. Gomes
  • Vincent Merckx
  • Katherine C. R. Baldock
  • Andrew T. D. Bennett
  • Ruth Boada
  • Riccardo Bommarco
  • Ralph Cartar
  • Natacha Chacoff
  • Juliana Dänhardt
  • Lynn V. Dicks
  • Carsten F. Dormann
  • Johan Ekroos
  • Kate S. E. Henson
  • Andrea Holzschuh
  • Robert R. Junker
  • Martha Lopezaraiza-Mikel
  • Jane Memmott
  • Ana Montero-Castano
  • Isabel L. Nelson
  • Theodora Petanidou
  • Eileen F. Power
  • Maj Rundlof
  • Henrik Smith
  • Jane C. Stout
  • Kehinde Temitope
  • Teja Tscharntke
  • Thomas Tscheulin
  • Montserrat Vila
  • William E. Kunin
Show all

Summary, in English

Co-flowering plant species commonly share flower visitors, and thus have the potential to influence each other's pollination. In this study we analysed 750 quantitative plant-pollinator networks from 28 studies representing diverse biomes worldwide. We show that the potential for one plant species to influence another indirectly via shared pollinators was greater for plants whose resources were more abundant (higher floral unit number and nectar sugar content) and more accessible. The potential indirect influence was also stronger between phylogenetically closer plant species and was independent of plant geographic origin (native vs. non-native). The positive effect of nectar sugar content and phylogenetic proximity was much more accentuated for bees than for other groups. Consequently, the impact of these factors depends on the pollination mode of plants, e.g. bee or fly pollinated. Our findings may help predict which plant species have the greatest importance in the functioning of plant-pollination networks.

Department/s

  • Centre for Environmental and Climate Science (CEC)
  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate

Publishing year

2014

Language

English

Pages

1389-1399

Publication/Series

Ecology Letters

Volume

17

Issue

11

Document type

Article

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Topic

  • Ecology (including Biodiversity Conservation)

Keywords

  • Facilitation
  • floral traits
  • flower density
  • flower resources
  • indirect
  • interactions
  • interspecific competition
  • morphological similarity
  • nectar
  • phylogenetic distance
  • plant-pollinator networks

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1461-023X