Menu

Javascript is not activated in your browser. This website needs javascript activated to work properly.
You are here

A note on EFSA’s ongoing efforts to increase transparency of uncertainty in scientific opinions

En kommentar om EFSA's pågående arbete att öka transparens i osäkerhet vid vetenskapliga bedömningar
Author:
  • Ullrika Sahlin
  • Matthias C.M. Troffaes
Publishing year: 2017-04-13
Language: English
Pages: 1-8
Publication/Series: Journal of Risk Research
Document type: Journal article
Publisher: Routledge

Abstract english

This is a comment on Lofstedt and Bouder?s paper, which explores the prospects of evidence based uncertainty analysis in Europe, focusing on the ongoing development on uncertainty analysis at the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). We very much welcome a discussion on the need to develop better treatment and communication of uncertainty in risk analysis, as we believe that such discussion is long overdue. Lofstedt and Bouder raise many relevant points, in particular the call for evidence based uncertainty analysis. However, there is need to distinguish different types of communication in the discussion and facilitate ? not diminish ? the description and communication of uncertainty between risk assessors and decision-makers. We find that EFSA has taken steps toward a novel approach to guide their scientific experts and risk assessors in uncertainty analysis based on a modern and scientific view on uncertainty.
This is a comment on Lofstedt and Bouder’s paper, which explores the prospects of evidence based uncertainty analysis in Europe, focusing on the ongoing development on uncertainty analysis at the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). We very much welcome a discussion on the need to develop better treatment and communication of uncertainty in risk analysis, as we believe that such discussion is long overdue. Lofstedt and Bouder raise many relevant points, in particular the call for evidence based uncertainty analysis. However, there is need to distinguish different types of communication in the discussion and facilitate – not diminish – the description and communication of uncertainty between risk assessors and decision-makers. We find that EFSA has taken steps toward a novel approach to guide their scientific experts and risk assessors in uncertainty analysis based on a modern and scientific view on uncertainty.

Keywords

  • Probability Theory and Statistics
  • Other Natural Sciences not elsewhere specified
  • Philosophy
  • uncertainty, guidance, communication, subjective, EFSA

Other

Published
  • ISSN: 1366-9877
me in Lundagård
E-mail: ullrika.sahlin [at] cec.lu.se

Researcher

Centre for Environmental and Climate Research (CEC)

+46 46 222 68 31

+46 73 827 44 32

E-D340

50

Read more on the blog

Extreme events in the real world and in the mind

2017-05-05
Last Friday April 28th I gave my docenture lecture for Environmental Science at Lund University. I talked about the importance of considerin…

Lundaloppet predictive challenge 2017

2017-05-04
Forecasting with uncertainty Guess your time in Lundaloppet 2017 and express your uncertainty in your running time in which way you want! Af…

The dawn of the new research group “UnEviL”

2017-04-13
Uncertainty and Evidence Lab is the name of a new research group at Lund University. The group is led by Ullrika Sahlin at the Centre of Env…

Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, CEC

Sölvegatan 37
223 62 Lund, Sweden

Visiting address
The Ecology building, Sölvegatan 37, Lund