The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Paul Caplat. Photo.

Paul Caplat

Researcher

Paul Caplat. Photo.

Integrating ecological knowledge, public perception and urgency of action into invasive species management

Author

  • Paul Caplat
  • Shaun R. Coutts

Summary, in English

Recently Prévot-Julliard and colleagues presented a concept paper on biological conservation strategies using exotic species as a case study. They emphasized the difficulty of integrating conservation into a broad picture that accounts for public perception as well as scientific knowledge. We support this general call for better integration of society in conservation research, but we believe that the original framework might misguide conservation practices if wrongly interpreted. Our objective is to complement their paper and correct a few misleading points, by showing that (1) for regions of high endemicity "reservation" may be the best conservation practice, and does not prevent public participation, (2) aiming for broad societal agreement is valuable, but in some cases risky, and always complex, and (3) calling a harmful invasive species harmful shouldn't be an issue. The Australian context provides us with many cases of the labeling of exotic species as harmful or not, using inputs from scientists, industry, and the public. Integration of social and scientific points of view can only improve conservation on the ground if it allows managers to use the ecological, economic and social impacts of exotic species to prioritize conservation actions in an operative way.

Publishing year

2011-11

Language

English

Pages

878-881

Publication/Series

Environmental Management

Volume

48

Issue

5

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Springer

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Conservation policy
  • Invasive management
  • Social integration

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0364-152X