The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Katarina Hedlund

Katarina Hedlund

Professor

Katarina Hedlund

Valuing Supporting Soil Ecosystem Services in Agriculture: A Natural Capital Approach

Author

  • Mark V. Brady
  • Katarina Hedlund
  • Ronggang Cong
  • Lia Hemerik
  • Stefan Hotes
  • Stephen Machado
  • Lennart Mattsson
  • Elke Schulz
  • Ingrid K. Thomsen

Summary, in English

Soil biodiversity through its delivery of ecosystem functions and attendant supporting ecosystem services-benefits soil organisms generate for farmers-underpins agricultural production. Yet lack of practical methods to value the long-term effects of current farming practices results, inevitably, in short-sighted management decisions. We present a method for valuing changes in supporting soil ecosystem services and associated soil natural capital-the value of the stock of soil organisms-in agriculture, based on resultant changes in future farm income streams. We assume that a relative change in soil organic C (SOC) concentration is correlated with changes in soil biodiversity and the generation of supporting ecosystem services. To quantify the effects of changes in supporting services on agricultural productivity, we fitted production functions to data from long-term field experiments in Europe and the United States. The different agricultural treatments at each site resulted in significant changes in SOC concentrations with time. Declines in associated services are shown to reduce both maximum yield and fertilizer-use efficiency in the future. The average depreciation of soil natural capital, for a 1% relative reduction in SOC concentration, was 144 (sic) ha(-1) (SD 47 (sic) ha(-1)) when discounting future values to their current value at 3%; the variation was explained by site-specific factors and the current SOC concentration. Moreover, the results show that soil ecosystem services cannot be fully replaced by purchased inputs; they are imperfect substitutes. We anticipate that our results will both encourage and make it possible to include the value of soil natural capital in decisions.

Department/s

  • Centre for Environmental and Climate Science (CEC)
  • Biodiversity
  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate
  • Soil Ecology

Publishing year

2015

Language

English

Pages

1809-1821

Publication/Series

Agronomy Journal

Volume

107

Issue

5

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Topic

  • Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-use

Status

Published

Research group

  • Soil Ecology

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0002-1962